Архів категорії: Право

Правозащитники обвинили Shell в нарушениях прав человека

В понедельник, 4 августа, группа нигерийских и международных организаций назвала “постыдной” систематическую неспособность правительства Нигерии и нефтяного гиганта Shell устранить страшное нефтяное загрязнение в дельте реки Нигер.

Организации “Друзья Земли Европы”, Amnesty International, “Движение за экологические права”, “Платформа” и Центр охраны природы, прав человека и развития (CEHRD) опубликовали доклад, в котором осуждается возмутительное бездействие компании Shell и правительства Нигерии и нежелание устранить загрязнение в Огониленде, несмотря на рекомендации серьёзного исследования ООН, данные ровно три года назад.

В 2011 году Программа ООН по окружающей среде опубликовала научное исследование о ситуации в области Огониленд, что в дельте реки Нигер. В исследовании рассказывается об обширном загрязнении окружающей среды, серьёзной опасности для здоровья населения, в том числе о непризнанном ранее загрязнении питьевой воды, а также о принципиальной несостоятельности процедур компании Shell по устранению разливов нефти.

Годвин Оджо из организации “Друзья Земли Нигерии” заявил: “Прошло три года, но правительство Нигерии и Shell только и сделали, что придумали процедуры, которые создают видимость действий, но на деле, как обычно, просто служат жалким прикрытием бизнесу. Отсутствие значимых действий при явном наличии неоспоримых научных доказательств возмутительно. В дельте Нигера правительству Нигерии и Shell попросту сходит с рук экологический беспредел и нарушения прав человека”.

Исследование ООН, проведённое по просьбе нигерийского правительства и оплаченное компанией Shell, выявило серьёзную несостоятельность правительства по части регулирования и контроля деятельности таких компаний как Shell. Кроме того, в докладе рассказывается о систематической неспособности Shell на протяжении многих лет ликвидировать последствия нефтяных разливов. По данным исследования ООН, специалисты организации выяснили, что участки, которые, по утверждениям Shell, были очищены, остались загрязнены.

Одри Гогран из Amnesty International сказала: “Сколько бы ни всплывало, фактов, доказывающих недобросовестность Shell, компании до сих пор удаётся уйти от необходимости ликвидировать последствия нанесённого урона. Доклад ЮНЕП однозначен: Shell не провела надлежащую очистку территории от нефтяных разливов. В её системе устранения загрязнений есть критические изъяны, что для десятков тысяч людей обернулось долгосрочным загрязнением окружающей среды и угрозой здоровью”.

Со дня публикации исследования ООН в 2011 году Shell отстаивает и продолжает использовать методы устранения нефтяных разливов, которые доклад ООН признал неэффективными. В докладе под названием No progress (“Продвижений нет”, на англ. яз.) подчёркивается, что Shell манипулирует информацией с целью уйти от ответственности за старые и прохудившиеся трубы – настолько старые, что компания не раскрывает информацию ни о давности их эксплуатации, ни об их состоянии.

Пол Кларк из организации “Друзья Земли Европы” сказал: “Прошло три года с тех пор, как Shell узнала о том, что в результате её деятельности почти каждый житель Огониленда – мужчины, женщины и дети, – и уж точно десятки тысяч людей, живущих в дельте реки Нигер, всю оставшуюся жизнь обречены провести на загрязнённой территории. Но всё равно Shell больше заботит собственная защита. Правительства Нигерии и стран, в которых находится Shell – Нидерландов и Соединённого Королевства – должны позаботиться о том, чтобы компания должным образом очистила загрязнённую территорию и компенсировала нанесённый ущерб”.

Помимо прочего, в исследовании ООН также рекомендовалось создать Управление по восстановлению окружающей среды Огониленда и Фонда восстановления окружающей среды с начальным капиталом в 1 миллиард долларов США. Пока не сделано ни то, ни другое.

Shell, правительства Нигерии и стран, где находится компания (Нидерландов и Соединённого Королевства), пользуются благами от нефтедобычи в дельте реки Нигер. Теперь они должны поддержать процесс экологической и социальной реабилитации, а также всестороннюю реализацию рекомендаций, приведённых в исследовании ООН. Об этом заявила группа организаций.

 

Источник

JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

European Parliament resolution on Ukraine (2014/2717(RSP))

The European Parliament,

– having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Neighbourhood Policy, on the Eastern Partnership (EaP) and on Ukraine, with particular reference to its resolution of 17 April 2014 on Russian pressure on Eastern Partnership countries and in particular destabilisation of eastern Ukraine,

– having regard to the joint statement of G7 leaders meeting in The Hague on 24 March 2014,

– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council conclusions of 17 March, 14 April, 12 May and 23 June 2014,

– having regard to the European Council conclusions of 20 March and 27 June 2014,

– having regard to the final report on the early presidential election in Ukraine of the OSCE/ODIHR International Election Observation Mission,

– having regard to the signing of the final parts of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, on 27 June 2014,

– having regard to the reports by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the human rights situation in Ukraine of 15 May and 15 June 2014,

– having regard to the statement of the NATO-Ukraine Commission of 1 April 2014,

– having regard to Rule 123(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas Ukraine continues to face serious security, political and socio-economic challenges; whereas the conflict in eastern Ukraine represents a serious impediment to the country’s development and prosperity;

B. whereas the Russian occupation and annexation of Crimea violates international law and Russia’s international obligations stemming from the UN Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, the Statute of the Council of Europe and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, as well as bilateral obligations deriving from the 1997 Bilateral Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership;

C. whereas on 25 May 2014 Petro Poroshenko was elected the new President of Ukraine; whereas the election was monitored by an international election observation mission led by the OSCE/ODIHR and – despite the hostile security environment in eastern Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia – deemed to have been largely in line with international commitments and respectful of fundamental freedoms in the vast majority of the country;

D. whereas the new President put forward a 15-point plan for a peaceful settlement of the situation in eastern Ukraine that would preserve the sovereignty, territorial integrity and national unity of Ukraine on the basis of an amnesty for those who surrendered and did not commit grave crimes, the establishment of controlled corridors for the retreat of Russian mercenaries, and the launch of an inclusive dialogue;

E. whereas, as a first step, President Poroshenko announced a unilateral ceasefire for the period of 20-30 June 2014 so as to enable consultations between Ukraine, Russia and separatist forces; whereas the ceasefire unilaterally declared by the Ukrainian Government was repeatedly violated, mainly by the separatists, and led to deaths on both sides;

F. whereas on 25 June 2014 the Russian Federation Council approved a decision by President Putin to renounce the right to send Russian armed forces to the territory of Ukraine;

G. whereas on 27 June 2014 the Foreign Affairs Council confirmed the analysis of the Commission that Ukraine had fulfilled all the benchmarks under the first phase of the Visa Liberalisation Action Plan and moved to the second phase of the visa liberalisation process;

H. whereas on 27 June 2014 the EU and Ukraine signed the remaining provisions of the Association Agreement / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (AA/DCFTA); whereas this agreement recognises the aspirations of the people of Ukraine to live in a country governed by European values, democracy and the rule of law;

I. whereas President Poroshenko decided to renew the anti-terrorist operation to defeat the separatist insurrection in the east following the failure of the unilateral ceasefire; whereas the Ukrainian army has regained control of several cities in eastern Ukraine, forcing rebels and mercenaries to withdraw towards Donetsk; whereas, however, violence still continues;

J. whereas the foreign ministers of Germany, France, Russia and Ukraine met in Berlin on 2 July 2014 and agreed to a set of measures aimed at leading to a sustainable mutual truce in eastern Ukraine;

K. whereas President Poroshenko expressed his willingness to announce a second ceasefire on three conditions, namely that the ceasefire be bilaterally observed, that all hostages be released and that effective control of the border be monitored by the OSCE;

L. whereas President Poroshenko declared on 14 July 2014 that Russian military staff officers were fighting against Ukrainian forces alongside separatist rebels and that a new Russian missile system had been established; whereas, according to NATO sources, Russia has allegedly been sending main battle tanks, artillery and other weapons to the rebels, and allowing mercenaries from Russia to cross the border to join rebel militias;

M. whereas a three-party consultation meeting between the EU, Ukraine and Russia was held in Brussels on 11 July 2014 on the implementation of the EU-Ukraine AA/DCFTA; whereas this is a useful process that may overcome long-lasting different understandings, by explaining the benefits of the AA/DCFTA and taking into account all the legitimate concerns of all parties;

1. Welcomes the signing of the remaining provisions of the AA, including the DCFTA, and is convinced that it will be a driving force for political and economic reform, bringing about modernisation, strengthening the rule of law and stimulating economic growth; expresses its support for Ukraine in proceeding with the provisional application of the Agreement; declares that the European Parliament will complete its procedure for the ratification of the Agreement as soon as possible; calls on the Member States and Ukraine to ratify it swiftly with a view to its full implementation as soon as possible;

2. Warmly welcomes, also, the signing of the Association Agreements with Georgia and Moldova, which mark the beginning of a new era in the political and economic relations of these countries with the EU; calls for their swift ratification and welcomes the fact that the parliament of Moldova has already done this; refutes the adoption of ‘punitive’ trade measures by Russia against those countries that have signed Association Agreements with the EU, as these agreements do not pose threats to Russia; underlines the fact that these moves are in contradiction with World Trade Organisation rules, are politically motivated and are therefore not acceptable;

3. Welcomes Petro Poroshenko’s election in the first round to the office of President of Ukraine, in a fair and democratic election; notes that the election result shows strong support among the population for a European and democratic perspective for the country;

4. Supports the peace plan as a major chance for de-escalation and peace; supports President Poroshenko’s decisive actions to guarantee the unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; welcomes his commitment to addressing the problem of systemic corruption and misuse of public funds; reiterates that Russia is involved in military action and supply; urges Russia to fulfil its international obligations, to genuinely commit to peaceful settlement negotiations and to use its real influence to stop any violence;

5. Calls for a new meeting of the Trilateral Contact Group on the settlement in south-eastern Ukraine, and supports new forms of communication between the parties;

6. Stresses the fundamental right of the Ukrainian people to freely determine their country’s economic and political future and reaffirms the right of Ukraine to self-defence, in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter; reiterates that the international community supports the unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; underlines the need for a political solution to the crisis;

7. Condemns Russia’s aggression on Crimea as a grave violation under international law of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity and rejects the Russian policy of the fait accompli in foreign relations; considers the annexation of Crimea to be illegal and refuses to recognise Russian de facto rule on the peninsula; welcomes the decision to prohibit the import of goods from Crimea and Sevastopol which do not have a Ukrainian certificate, and encourages other countries to introduce similar measures in line with UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262;

8. Condemns the ongoing violence and daily loss of lives in eastern Ukraine, the destruction of homes and properties and the flight of many thousand civilians from conflict areas to safe havens; welcomes the goodwill shown by the Ukrainian side in adopting a unilateral ceasefire and regrets the fact that the rebels and mercenaries refused to follow that example;

9. Calls on Russia to support the peace plan with true determination, to adopt measures to control its own border with Ukraine effectively and stop the continued incursion of illegal armed men and of arms and equipment, hostile action and infiltration, to immediately reduce and pull back its troops from its border with Ukraine, and to use its power over the rebels and mercenaries to force them to respect the ceasefire, lay down their weapons and withdraw back to Russia via a retreat corridor, as provided for in the Poroshenko peace plan, as the first long-awaited concrete steps to prove that Russia is serious about de-escalating the crisis;

10. Deplores the illegal detention of Ukrainian air force navigator Nadija Savchenko in Russia and demands her immediate release, as well as the release of all hostages held in Ukraine or Russia;

11. Calls on the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) and on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to have a stronger presence and greater visibility in the dialogue mechanisms established with a view to resolving the crisis, including the Contact Group;

12. Welcomes the extension of the current sanctions to a further 11 people, most of whom are officials of the so-called separatist authorities; welcomes the preparatory work undertaken by the Council, the EEAS and the Member States with a view to further sanctions against Russia, which should include the economic, financial and energy sectors, and an arms and dual-use technology embargo; calls for a collective ban on the sale of arms to Russia and urges its implementation until the situation in eastern Ukraine has normalised; warns that any further steps by Russia to destabilise Ukraine will lead to additional and far-reaching consequences for EU-Russian relations;

13. Demands that the Council call on Russia to fulfil its obligations under international law, and that it apply the third phase of sanctions should the situation so require;

14. Urges the European Council to adopt a more coherent and firmer strategy – and to speak with one voice – vis-à-vis the Ukrainian crisis and the behaviour of the Russian Government, including on matters related to EU energy security; deplores the fact that some Member States are showing disunity in this regard and a lack of EU solidarity;

15. Supports a renewed, mutually agreed ceasefire in order to stabilise the security situation, achieve a genuine de-escalation and create momentum for the implementation of President Poroshenko’s peace plan, which is conditional on the ceasefire being respected bilaterally, hostages being released and the OSCE monitoring effective border control; welcomes the latest successes of the Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine and the fact that they have regained control of several major cities;

16. Strongly believes that the role of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission should be strengthened, with increased material and financial means, so as to support Ukraine in securing and monitoring the regions along its border;

17. Reminds the Ukrainian Government that domestic economic and political reforms are urgently needed; points out that domestic reforms should not be initiated solely on account of external pressure, but should be based on solid popular support for creating sustainable economic and social opportunities by modernising the country;

18. Calls for an independent and impartial investigation of all the deadly events and crimes against humanity that have taken place in all parts of Ukraine since November 2013, with the inclusion of a strong international component and under the supervision of the Council of Europe, and for those responsible to be brought to justice; is convinced that only the effective investigation of these crimes will help Ukrainian society and the families and friends of the victims recover trust in the institutions;

19. Recalls the necessity of ending the systematic and structural curtailment of human rights, the bad governance, the widespread corruption and the colossal shadow economy in Ukraine; stresses the importance of the ongoing process of constitutional reform, and the importance of supporting the development of civil society in achieving a true participatory democracy which promotes and protects human rights, ensuring justice and good governance for all people in all regions of the country and thus contributing to its security and stability; calls for the adoption of an anti-discrimination law in line with European standards;

20. Considers that it is of the utmost importance to start a gradual process of decentralising central powers to regional and municipal administrations without undermining the internal balance of powers or the effective functioning of the state;

21. Welcomes the adoption of the public procurement law and calls for its diligent implementation; expects the prompt establishment of a politically independent anti-corruption agency with powers to investigate corrupt conduct;

22. Stresses the need to strengthen the rule of law, also by engaging in judicial reform which would contribute to restoring citizens’ trust in the judiciary, and the need to de-politicise and de-militarise the structure of the law enforcement bodies;

23. Welcomes the decision to establish a robust civilian common security and defence policy mission to Ukraine; calls on the VP/HR and the Member States to speed up its deployment; is convinced that this mission needs to have an ambitious mandate in order to support the Ukrainians effectively in the necessary in-depth efforts to stabilise the situation in the country;

24. Reiterates its support for President Poroshenko’s intention to hold early parliamentary elections; underlines the fact that these elections must be conducted in line with the Venice Commission recommendations;

25. Expresses deep concern over the worsening human rights and humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, caused by rebels and mercenaries at Russia’s instigation, in particular with regard to torture, killings, disappearances of journalists and activists, and hostage taking, including cases of child abduction; calls for better protection of civilians and for the Ukrainian authorities to grant humanitarian aid in the regions concerned;

26. Underlines the necessity of finding a clear, fair and stable solution to ensure the security of gas supply from Russia to Ukraine, as this is a necessary prerequisite for the economic development and stability of Ukraine; believes that the EU should continue to play its role in facilitating an agreement allowing Ukraine to pay a competitive price, which is not politically motivated, for its gas purchases; stresses that the use of energy resources as a foreign policy tool undermines the long-term credibility of Russia as a reliable trading partner for the EU and that further measures to lower the EU’s dependency on Russian gas must be a priority;

27. Calls on the Member States to ensure sufficient gas supply through reverse gas flow from neighbouring states in the EU; welcomes, to this end, the memorandum of understanding on reverse flows between the Slovak Republic and Ukraine, which should encourage Ukraine to establish a transparent and reliable gas transportation system; recalls the strategic role of the Energy Community, of which Ukraine holds the presidency in 2014; welcomes the fact that cooperation with Ukraine forms an integral part of the Commission’s European Energy Security Strategy presented in June 2014;

28. Welcomes the fact that Ukraine has recently moved to the second phase of the Visa Liberalisation Action Plan, thereby reconfirming its determination to put in place the necessary legislative, policy and institutional framework; expresses its firm conviction that the end-goal should be the swift introduction of a visa-free regime; calls, in the meantime, for the immediate introduction of very simple, low-cost procedures on a temporary basis at EU and Member State level;

29. Welcomes the Commission’s creation of the Support Group for Ukraine, which will provide the Ukrainian authorities with all necessary assistance in undertaking political and economic reforms and will work on the implementation of the ‘European Agenda for Reform’;

30. Underlines the need to defend European interests and values and to promote stability, prosperity and democracy in the countries of the European continent;

31. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States, the President, Government and Parliament of Ukraine, the Council of Europe and the President, Government and Parliament of the Russian Federation.

Appeal of the youth of Dnipropetrovsk region concerning Nadia Savchenko

The recent events in Ukraine dramatically changed our way of thinking and worldview. We build absolutely new society, which is guided by the principles of democracy and respect of human dignity. All of us became the patriots of our country Ukraine, and that is what gives us inspiration and will to take part in the process of building the new country, where the out-dated and unproductive system is broken and replaced by the new system of mutual respect.

It is not a surprise, that it is we, the youth of Ukraine, who became a driving force for the positive changes. We don’t want and will not stay apart from all the processes, that take place in our country. It is we, who will live in the country, that we are building now, and it is we, who will have to govern the country and will be the politicians of the day of tomorrow. The main function of the state is to protect all of its citizens, regardless of the colour, religion, political views and gender. This constitutional duty of the country is the duty of all of us as well.

53023Today one of us is in a great trouble. Our compatriot airwoman Nadia Savchenko defended our Motherland and fought against the terrorism. She fought for those values, which we seek to embody in our country: independance, lawful society and respect to human’s dignity. But unfortunatelly her helicopter was shot down by the terrorists and she fell prisoner.

Then something happend, that could not be imagined, guiding by the common sense: at first the young woman was unlawfully transported across the border to Russia, thrown to the detention center in Voronezh (Russian Federation), which contradicts all off the possible international laws and legal standards. The more the worse: for a contrived reasons the young woman was haled into court and accused of the murder of Russian journalists.

Such situation could not have happened in a modern civil society, that lives by the rules of democracy. Only the country, that respects neither human dignity, rights and freedoms nor the law and rule of peacefulness, can act like this.

We want to be heard not only by Ukrainian community, but also by the whole world.

We plead to be heard by all those, who care about the fate of the Ukrainian young woman, who risked her life to defend the Homeland, but was by the twist of a fate kidnapped by the terrorists.

Please, help us to bring Nadia Savchenko back to Ukraine and save her life!

Sincerely yours,

the youth of Dnipropetrovsk region