Всі записи автора Yuriy Lozovenko
Львівських студентів закликатимуть більше їздити велосипедом
18 березня в рамках ініціативи «Центр соціальних інновацій», Інститутом міста було проведено першу зустріч проекту «Ровером на пари». Його мета – популяризація велосипеду як основного засобу пересування містом серед молоді.
Акцент було зроблено на студентах, оскільки саме вони є найбільш мобільною категорією населення та найшвидше здатні змінюватись та призвичаюватись до чогось нового. Саме вони можуть стати рушійною силою для розвитку велоруху у Львові.
В обговоренні проблем та шляхів їх вирішення взяли участь радник міського голови з питань розвитку велоінфраструктури Олег Шмід, координатор Європейського тижня мобільності, співзасновник майданчику урбан-руху Lypneva.com та завідувач сектору внутрішньої промоції міста Львівської міської ради Дем`ян Данилюк, головні спеціалісти управління молоді, сім`ї та спорту Львівської міської ради Петро Гошовський та Роман Андрес, а також студенти Національного університету «Львівська політехніка».
На заході було проведено презентацію основних аспектів проекту та результатів дослідження щодо використання велосипеду як засобу для пересування містом (результати моніторингу «Якість життя у Львові»). Зокрема, 18% львів’ян мають велосипед, а лише близько 7% використовує його регулярно як основний вид транспорту.
«Зважаючи на те, що за результатами дослідження кожен 10-ий львівський студент користується велосипедом як засобом пересування по місту, метою проекту є покращити цей показник та збільшити його утричі – в перспективі 5 років кожен третій студент буде використовувати велосипед як свій основний транспорт в межах Львова», – зазначила Мар’яна Малачівська-Данчак, керівник програми аналізу та досліджень Інституту міста.
Що стосується студентства, то велосипед мають 28% студентів Львова, а із загальної їх кількості щодня або майже щодня його використовує лише до 11%. 57% опитаних студентів були б згідні використовувати велосипед як основний засіб пересування. Серед причин, чому більшість студентів наразі не користується велосипедом, опитані зазначили нестачу велодоріжок у Львові, небезпечність пересування міськими дорогами, незручність велосипеду як транспорту загалом, а також високу його вартість.
6 Freeway Removals That Changed Their Cities Forever
It seems counterintuitive, right? Rip out eight lanes of freeway through the middle of your metropolis and you’ll be rewarded with not only less traffic, but safer, more efficient cities? But it’s true, and it’s happening in places all over the world.
Many freeway systems were overbuilt in an auto-obsessed era, only to realise later that cities are actually healthier, greener, and safer without them. Like freeway cap parks , which hope to bridge the chasms through severed neighborhoods — Boston’s Big Dig is a great example — freeway removal projects try to eradicate and undo the damage wrought from highways, while creating new, multifunctional shared streets that can be utilized by transit, bikes, walkers and yes, even cars.
OK, you’re thinking, but where do all the cars go? It turns out that when you take out a high-occupancy freeway it doesn’t turn the surface streets into the equivalent of the Autobahn. A theory called “induced demand” proves that if you make streets bigger, more people will use them. When you make them smaller, drivers discover and use other routes, and traffic turns out to be about the same. Don’t believe it? Check out these freeway removals in cities all over the world and see for yourself.
Embarcadero Freeway, San Francisco
Looking at San Francisco now, it’s hard to believe that a massive, stacked freeway ran right along what is now one of the most scenic views of the bay. But there it was, State Route 480, until the 1989 Loma Prieta quake damaged it. There had been talk about removing the freeway since the early 1980s, but the earthquake spurred the conversation along, and demolition began in 1991.
The result was a triumph for downtown San Francisco, which now had miles of public space, walking and bike paths, plus new transit routes where the double-decker freeway once was. The city also helped prove to the rest of the world that freeway removal was not only possible but could be an economic boon for the city, since San Francisco both saved money on construction — installing the wide boulevard was cheaper than fixing the freeway — and the new development increased property values. San Francisco actually got two great removal projects out of this earthquake: The city’s damaged Central Freeway also became Octavia Boulevard.
Cheonggyecheon, Seoul
One of the most transformative freeway removal projects not only tore out a dirty highway from a city center, it actually daylighted a lost waterway. An elevated highway had been built through Seoul in 1976 as a way to boost economic prospects in a low-lying area which had become a slum. In 2003, the city’s mayor proposed to remove the freeway and and turn the site into green space, which also required naturalizing the creek that once ran there.
Not only has the greenway become a well-loved part of the city, it has proven to benefit the city in many different ways. The temperature of the inner city has dropped several degrees, and birds, fish and other wildlife have returned to the urban core. Also, since the freeways were removed, fewer people are driving into the city, choosing to take public transit or other options.
Harbor Drive, Portland
In the 1950s, the six lanes of Route 99 ran along the Willamette River as a major thoroughfare, but as other freeways were built, it became less popular with drivers, who could get across the city faster using one of the newer roads. In the 1960s the mayor proposed transforming the highway into open space, and the freeway was closed for good in 1974. The ensuing open space stretches along a long portion of the riverfront.
Portland remains one of the best cities for river access thanks to this important decision. In addition to the several parks that were created, other ageing buildings were also removed to allow for additional public space, and the revitalized river also helped to spur development in the now very popular industrial areas just to the west of the banks.
Park East, Milwaukee
The downtown area of Milwaukee was supposed to be completely surrounded by a freeway, and construction had even started in the 1960s, when opposition began to mount, halting part of the project from being built. Luckily, a few decades later, the city began development of its Riverwalk project, and realised the benefits of having open access from the downtown area to the river. The Park East Freeway was seen as a barrier to increased development and was demolished starting in 2002.
McKinley Avenue replaced the freeway, and renewal plans began to lure new tenants to the area and connect it to the Riverwalk development. Property values have gone up and the area is now a desirable place for people and companies, although some say the increased interest in the area took longer than expected.
Rio Madrid, Madrid
Like many urban rivers, Madrid’s Manzanares River was an important part of the city’s history, but had been completely neglected after two large spans of the M-30 freeway took over its banks. A plan to revitalize the river was set in motion in the early 2000s and opened to the public in 2011. Traffic was rerouted through several underground tunnels, and the land adjacent to the river was completely redeveloped into a 300-acre park that includes running and biking trails, skate parks, recreation centres, 17 (!) playgrounds, and even an urban beach.
The impact of the Rio Madrid project has been astounding for the city, with studies proving that residents who live close to the park and access it frequently are becoming healthier.
Alaskan Way, Seattle (in progress)
Up in Seattle there’s another removal project that was launched into action by an earthquake. The Alaskan Way Viaduct in downtown Seattle was damaged in the 2001 quake and needed to be completely rebuilt to new seismic standards. So engineers decided to take the road itself underground, and they’re building a smaller, two-mile, four-lane tunnel through which to reroute cars.
In addition to tucking cars below grade, the project will create a connections between the local neighborhoods and the waterfront, bringing public space and pedestrian walkways to these residents. The project should be completed next year.
And one to come? I-345, Dallas (proposed)
The latest city to jump on the freeway removal bandwagon is Dallas, where a hunk of Interstate 345 separates downtown from the popular Deep Ellum neighbourhood. It’s still early in the game, but the Texas Department of Transportation has agreed to a study of the project, even though it’s already planning a $US100 million renovation of the freeway.
A group named A New Dallas is leading the cause, hoping to reclaim the freeway land for real estate opportunities, pedestrian connections and parks.
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/03/6-freeway-demolitions-that-changed-their-cities-forever/